English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 13677862      Online Users : 34
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    National Tsing Hua University Institutional Repository > 清華出版品 > 01 清華學報 > 新35卷第2期 >  「文類體裁」的「藝術性向」與「社會性向」及其「雙向成體」的關係


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/75706


    Title: 「文類體裁」的「藝術性向」與「社會性向」及其「雙向成體」的關係
    Other Titles: On Literary Form: The Interaction Between the ";Aesthetic - oriented,";the ";Social - oriented,";and the ";Aesthetic - social";Balanced Literary Form
    Authors: 顏崑陽;Kun-yang Yen
    Date: 2005/12
    Publisher: 國立清華大學出版社
    Relation: 清華學報,國立清華大學,2005,new,35n.2,p295.
    Keywords: 雙向成體
    社會性向
    藝術性向
    文類體裁
    Abstract: ABSTRACT
    Since the late Qing Dynasty, it has been a common critical practice to divide Chinese prose writingsodern as well as ancientnto two categories: the prose of art and the prose of utility or, in another set of terms, the pure literary writing (chunwenxue) and the mixed literary writing (tsawen-xue). This framework of discussion views literature as essentially divided by a binary opposition between the artistic and the useful, a binary that results in the perpetual rupture between art and society as if the former existed in an inner realm isolated from the external realm of society without any interaction. This framework is problematic either as a theoretical formulation or for creative writingnd, in itself, are embedded the elements of deconstruc-tion.
    This paper takes this classification of styles as its point of departure. After deconstructing its framework, we have to ask: is there an essential distinction of literary styles between the artistic and the useful? My argument is that such a distinctionhe artistic in opposition to the useful, or "chun" in opposition to "tsa"oes not exist as the eternal essence prior to the actual practice of writing. The classification of literary styles is only a mediating common ground made in and by language for the social interaction among critics and writers; it is only a "principle" established on the basis of a literary tradition and the consensus of the academic community. There is no ready-made "artistic nature" or "social nature" in literary styles, but there is the instrumental structure and function for writers to crystallize artistic and/or social possibilities in their works. Therefore, there are only two potential dimensions: that is, the "aesthetic-oriented" and the "social-oriented." Any literary style must simultaneously possess these two dimensions, forming a co-existent relation,
    "aesthetic-social" balanced literary form.
    Key words: literary form, aesthetic-oriented, social-oriented, "aesthetic-social" balanced literary form
    URI: http://thjcs.hss.nthu.edu.tw/catalogue_detail.php?id=46
    http://thup.et.nthu.edu.tw/
    http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/75706
    Appears in Collections:[01 清華學報] 新35卷第2期

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    JA01_2005_p295.pdf7159KbAdobe PDF288View/Open


    在NTHUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護,僅提供學術研究及教育使用,敬請尊重著作權人之權益。若須利用於商業或營利,請先取得著作權人授權。
    若發現本網站收錄之內容有侵害著作權人權益之情事,請權利人通知本網站管理者(smluo@lib.nthu.edu.tw),管理者將立即採取移除該內容等補救措施。

    SFX Query

    與系統管理員聯絡

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback