English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 15213886      Online Users : 104
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/74323

    Title: 陳白沙自然之學的定位問題
    Other Titles: A Re-Evaluation of Chen Baisha's Learning of Nature
    Authors: 黃敏浩;Simon Man Ho Wong
    Date: 2008/12
    Publisher: 國立清華大學出版社
    Relation: 清華學報,國立清華大學,2008,new,v.38,n.4,p.599
    Keywords: 陳白沙
    Chen Baisha
    nature, sitting meditation
    Abstract: 明代大儒陳白沙學宗自然,歷來學者對其思想的評價當以明末的黃宗羲為代表,但本人認為劉蕺山對白沙的批評也不應被忽略。本文擬就黃宗羲的評語論述白沙學的主要內容,並從黃宗羲對白沙自然觀念的定位帶出劉蕺山的批評,藉以說明白沙自然境界之限度。當中也論及古今一些學者對白沙學說的評判。本文認為,必須以黃宗羲及劉蕺山的評價相關而看,才能得白沙自然之學之實。 Huang Zongxi's commentary on the great Ming Confucian scholar Chen Baisha and his learning of nature is well-known; Liu Jishan's, on the other hand, has received less attention from scholars. This article first examines Huang Zongxi's commentary and points out its weaknesses. Second, through examining Liu Jishan's criticism of Chen Baisha, we reveal the limitations of. Chen's theory. Finally, the article discusses other comments on Chen's theory from both ancient and modern scholarship. We conclude that Liu Jishan's critique is as important as Huang Zongxi's in the evaluation of Chen Bai-sha's learning of nature.
    URI: http://thjcs.hss.nthu.edu.tw/catalogue_detail.php?id=923
    Appears in Collections:[01 清華學報] 新38卷第4期

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    JA01_2008_p599.pdf708KbAdobe PDF303View/Open


    SFX Query


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback