English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 14528328      Online Users : 67
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/75579


    Title: 論條件音變
    Other Titles: On Conditioned Change
    Authors: 張光宇;Kuang-yu Chang
    Date: 2000/12
    Publisher: 國立清華大學出版社
    Relation: 清華學報,國立清華大學,2000,new,v.30,n.4,p.427.
    Keywords: 條件音變
    Abstract: ABSTRACT
    As the development of the western discipline of historical linguistics has shown us, conditioned change and the comparative method are two sides of the same coin. Following Grimm's law of 1822, there came a sequence of laws: Lottner's law, the law of the palatals, Grassmann's law, as well as Verner's law, each marking a milestone leading the comparative method to its maturity in the later part of the nineteenth century. In retrospect, one may be curious about what happened in its eastern counterpart? It is safe to say that the majority of what has been said about conditioned change in Chinese historical phonology was by its very nature circumstantial, a hub of disputes. There are several reasons for this. For Karlgren, the great Swedish Sinologist who laid down the most important cornerstones for the reconstruction of Chinese historical phonology, the first objective was to transcribe the Chinese terminology into a sound system. Unlike his Western colleagues in the field of Indo-European languages, who were free of traditional burdens, Karlgren did not base his reconstruction purely on the comparative method. In many cases his method was a philological one, and as such, there was not much to say concerning conditioned change. This situation has remained basically unchanged even in the post-Karlgren period. Due to the relative paucity of Chinese dialect material before 1980, little evidence could be referred to in discussing conditioned change on a solid foundation. This is the second reason why discussion on conditioned change has remained largely theoretical rather than scientific.
    This study is based on cross-dialect comparison. Most cases in this paper are discussed in a quite straightforward manner; we need only to compare two closely related dialects to ascertain which form serves as the conditioning factor and which form has undergone the conditioned change. Butthere are also cases where we are required to reinterpret the previously reconstructed forms or to do triangulation on our own before we proceed.
    Reinterpretation is needed in cases where dialects show no sign of distinction for the different categories in ancient texts. An example of this is to be found in *吵g and *ang, which have merged as a single category in most modern Chinese dialects, north and south. In order to facilitate the procedure, I have treated them as simply one final: og (following Lu Zhiwei's view of 3 being equal to an open o). Likewise, Karlgren's -B which occurs mainly in third division finals (excepting one occurrence in second division final) can be viewed as a variant to his a (with a back vowel quality of some sort, that is, o~o).
    Triangulation is put into practice when cases arise indicating that a bipartite development is involved. One example of this is found in the Middle Chinese Yin rhyme (*J9n), from which derived the various forms in the overwhelming majority of Chinese dialects. In striking contrast are the Hakka and Min dialects which appear to be quite different. As a first approximation of what might have happened in Chinese historical phonology, the triangulation is applied as shown in the following configuration: (take KK. for example)
    **xjun
    xjun
    Gin
    hiun
    him
    Beijing Meixian Amoy
    Viewed in this way, the bizarre form of Amoy can be explained in terms of conditioned change. There are many other parallel incidents that give credence to the theory of bipartite development in Chinese historical phonology. A perfect or near perfect parallelism is to be found in Western Europe, compare the above configuration with diagrams involving proto-Latin as well as Proto-Germanic.
    The past two decades have seen an ever-increasing amount of Chinese dialect material come to light, and yet more can be expected to come. Based on hard facts gathered across China, one can pinpoint exactly what rules put forth in the past have a solid footing as opposed to those which are merely circumstantial. Instead of recapitulating what has been said in the paper, I have deliberately chosen to concentrate on my working principles in this summary. This is because I am of the opinion that in the study of conditioned change, we are often faced with the problem of setting a starting point, and without the guidelines sketched above, the great treasure of Chinese dialect material would in many respects remain inaccessible.
    Key words: Chinese dialects, Conditioned change
    URI: http://thjcs.hss.nthu.edu.tw/catalogue_detail.php?id=123
    http://thup.et.nthu.edu.tw/
    http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/75579
    Appears in Collections:[01 清華學報] 新30卷第4期

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    JA01_2000_p427.pdf9168KbAdobe PDF1507View/Open


    在NTHUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護,僅提供學術研究及教育使用,敬請尊重著作權人之權益。若須利用於商業或營利,請先取得著作權人授權。
    若發現本網站收錄之內容有侵害著作權人權益之情事,請權利人通知本網站管理者(smluo@lib.nthu.edu.tw),管理者將立即採取移除該內容等補救措施。

    SFX Query

    與系統管理員聯絡

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback