English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 14751977      Online Users : 97
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/75635

    Title: 漢語方言的地理考察:韻母篇
    Other Titles: Chinese Dialects: Final System
    Authors: 張光宇;Kuang-yu Chang
    Date: 2004/12
    Publisher: 國立清華大學出版社
    Relation: 清華學報,國立清華大學,2004,new,34,n.2,p513.
    Keywords: 漢語
    Abstract: The number of finals varies greatly from one dialect to another in China. The largest stock (94) is found in Foshan, Guangdong; the least (22) in Binchuan, Yunnan. Extremes aside, the general tendency indicates that the figure decreases as one travels from the south to the north or from the eastern coast westward into the inlands. As a break from the traditional exercises, in which vertical comparison dominates Chinese dialectology, this paper demonstrates how a horizontal comparison can be put into practice to derive the various modern forms. In this respect, I find Hoenigswald's remark most inspiring; he said: "It should, however, be understood that neither the comparative method nor internal reconstruction depend on written records." (1991:187) The same tone is also echoed in Crowley (1997: 111): "the written records do not provide us with the same forms that the comparative method leads us to reconstruct." Examples that were used by Crowley to arrive at his conclusion are drawn from the Latin languages, but I think the same principle holds true in other language family as well. In an era when vertical comparison monopolizes the entire realm of Chinese dialectology, phonological rules are a wooly matterhonetic motivation not so much a concern. Last but not least, a few words about "Uniformitarinism" as Ran-kin (2003) puts it: "the method also relies on the more general scientific notion of uniformitarianism, here the understanding that basic mechanisms of linguistic change in the past (e.g., phonetic change, reanalysis, extension, etc.) were not substantially different from those observed in the present. Most linguists operate with this as a given and it has not received detailed treatment in most studies of language change, but without the assumption of uniformitariansm, reconstruction would not be possible." Much ink has been spilled about methodology, and I hope the above quotes should give readers useful guidance clear enough to get down to the bottom.
    URI: http://thjcs.hss.nthu.edu.tw/catalogue_detail.php?id=64
    Appears in Collections:[01 清華學報] 新34卷第2期

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    JA01_2004_p513.pdf2525KbAdobe PDF276View/Open


    SFX Query


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback