English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 15073571      Online Users : 73
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    National Tsing Hua University Institutional Repository > 清華出版品 > 01 清華學報 > 新24卷第4期 >  清代思想史「研究典範」的形成、特質與義涵

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/78587

    Title: 清代思想史「研究典範」的形成、特質與義涵
    Other Titles: ";Research Paradigms";in the Study of Ching Intellectual History: Their Formation, Characteristics, and Implications
    Authors: 丘為軍;Eugene W. Chiu
    Date: 1994/12
    Publisher: 國立清華大學出版社
    Relation: 清華學報,國立清華大學,1994,new,v.24,n.4,p451.
    Keywords: 研究典範
    Abstract: 清代思想史的研究,是截至目前為止有關中國思想史各時期的研究當中,理論觀點最豐碩的時期之一。本研究旨在回顧與探討二十世紀中國在此 一領域內最具影響性的三個學說:梁啟超與胡適的「理學反動說」、錢穆的「每轉益進說」,以及余英時的「內在理路說」。本篇是在孔恩 (Thomas S. Kuhn) 的「典範」 (paradigm)的概念下,來討論上述三個重要學說。在「典範」意義的前提下,本文主要側重兩個面向:第一、就「理論結構」而言,這三個學說的基本內涵與特色為何?第二、就思想史的觀點而言,這三個學說的形成與時代之間存在著何種關係?也就是說,此關係的基本意義為何?
    Among the studies of all periods of Chinese intellectual history, the studies of intellectual history of the Ch'ing period reach one of the most fruitful achievements in terms of the variety of theory and the depth of interpretation. This study aims to review and probe the three most influential theories in the area of Ch'ing intellectual history in 20th- century China. They are the theory of "Reaction against Neo-Confucianism" (li-hsueh fan-tung shuo) of Liang Ch'i-ch'ao (1873-1929) and Hu Shih (1891-1962), the theory of "Accumulation" (mei-chuan i-chin shuo} of Ch'ien Mu (1895-1990), and finally, the theory of "Inner Logic" (nei-tsai li-lu shuo} of Yu Ying-shih (1930 - ). The present study analyzes the three doctrines in the light of Thomas S. Kuhn's concept of "paradigms". Adapting this concept, the stress is on two foci: First, in terms of the structure of theory, the basic contents and characteristics of these three doctrines are examined; And second, in terms of intellectual history, the relationship between the formation of these doctrines and the times which the doctrine-proposers lived in are scrutinized with a view towards evolving the fundamental meaning between the two.
    URI: http://thjcs.web.nthu.edu.tw/files/14-1662-41516,r2987-1.php
    Appears in Collections:[01 清華學報] 新24卷第4期

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    JA01_1994_p451.pdf2330KbAdobe PDF1142View/Open


    SFX Query


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback