English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 13696819      Online Users : 33
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    National Tsing Hua University Institutional Repository > 歷任校長 > 沈君山 (1994-1997) > 期刊論文 >  How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/80882


    Title: How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements
    Authors: Aggarwal, J;Bohm, F;Foster, G;Halas, S;Honisch, B;Jiang, SY;Kosler, J;Liba, A;Rodushkin, I;Sheehan, T;Shen, JJS;Tonarini, S;Xie, QL;You, CF;Zhao, ZQ;Zuleger, E
    教師: 沈君山
    Date: 2009
    Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
    Relation: JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, Royal Society of Chemistry, Volume 24, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 825-831
    Keywords: IONIZATION MASS-SPECTROMETRY
    Abstract: In order to address the correct reporting and therefore comparison of isotopic measurements across different instrument types and instrumental techniques a prepared set of synthetic standards was sent to 28 laboratories for boron (B) isotopic analyses. Standards were prepared from enriched and purified isotopic salts to avoid any sample preparation fractionation. The range in uncertainties of the analyses between different instrumental analytical techniques is as large as the differences within an instrumental analytical technique obscuring any systematic offset. We conclude that uncertainties in the measurement of delta(11)B values were often underestimated and a procedure is suggested to allow a better comparison of the different techniques. Two new standards (JABA and JABB) have been quantified and these are available to all laboratories for testing their analyses. The delta(11)B values of these new standards are 10.0 parts per thousand and -23.7 parts per thousand. The results from this exercise impact on the way all isotope measurements are performed and reported. Guidelines are defined to aid the comparison of measurements between different laboratories.
    Relation Link: http://www.rsc.org/
    URI: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/80882
    Appears in Collections:[沈君山 (1994-1997)] 期刊論文
    [物理系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    2010101010041.pdf2454KbAdobe PDF873View/Open


    在NTHUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護,僅提供學術研究及教育使用,敬請尊重著作權人之權益。若須利用於商業或營利,請先取得著作權人授權。
    若發現本網站收錄之內容有侵害著作權人權益之情事,請權利人通知本網站管理者(smluo@lib.nthu.edu.tw),管理者將立即採取移除該內容等補救措施。

    SFX Query

    與系統管理員聯絡

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback