English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 54367/62174 (87%)
Visitors : 9399704      Online Users : 141
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTHU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/81429


    Title: 分子模型與立體化學的解題
    Other Titles: Molecular Kits and Problem Solving in Stereochemistry
    Authors: 邱美虹;傅化文
    教師: 傅化文
    Date: 1993
    Publisher: 中華民國科學教育學會
    Relation: 科學教育學刊, 中華民國科學教育學會, 第1卷, 第2期, JUN 1993, Pages 161-188
    Keywords: 心智模式
    分子模型
    問題表徵
    解題
    Mental models
    Molecular kits
    Problem representation
    Problem solving
    Abstract: 本研究的目的是在探討受測者如何使用分子模型(molecular kit)來解決立體化學中(stereochemistry)異構物(isomers)的問題。研究方法乃是利用出聲思維(think-aloud)的技巧來瞭解受測者之心智模式(mental model)在解題過程中所扮演的角色以及策略使用與對分子表徵之理解的情形。根據一般分子表示法,研究者以下列四種型態為主要比較的種類來觀察何種表徵對解題較有利,以及不同表徵與分子模型可能產生的互動關係(interaction):(1)分子式表示法(2)平面二度空間的表示法(3)三度(或二度半)空間的表示法(4)給予實際以分子模型作好的分子結構。合計共有9個問題。這些題目中有些是相同(或是相似)的分子但表示法不同,以便比較不同表徵對解題的影響。
    本研究結果顯示,分子表徵方式不同,對學生解題影響頗大。平均而言,學生在解題上的學習成就最高為第四類型。誠如預期,給予實際分子模型學生表現較佳。其他依次為類型一、類型三、類型二。出乎意料的是學生在類型一的表現遠較類型二、類型三為佳(僅與前者達顯著差異,5%)。高成就組的學生對平面的投影之表徵方式能轉換成三度空間來判斷其分子的立體結構,然而低成就組對平面的表示法則往往無法透視(visualize)或想像(imagine)其原子間的相對位置。然而在面對具體的分子模型時,學生在解題上表現較佳,高、低成就組相差最少。故使用分子模型,對低成就組學生幫助頗大。這結果可提供教師教學時的參考。同時高成就組在解題時其所呈現的方式品質(quality)較佳,對問題亦有多樣表徵(multiple representations),有助解題。然而低成就組則往往只視分子為平面結構,造成解題上的錯誤。
    The focus of this present study was on understanding how students solve problems in stereochemistry. In particular, how students solve problems with different representations of moleculars, and the idiosyncratics of their problem-solving strategies.
    Subjects were individually interviewed by the researcher using the think-aloud method. With this method subjects were given tasks and asked to describe how they were solving the task. The data consist of a transcript of each interview and written work the subject produced. All interviews were tape-recorded and videotaped for later transcription and analysis.
    The findings suggest that on average, the more successful students out-performed the less successful students in all four types of questions (namely chemical formula, 2D and 3D representations in a paper, and a real molecular model). The biggest difference between the successful students and unsuccessful students was on Type II which required the students to decide what type of isomer a compound is from a planary representation. The biggest difference on their performance indicates that the more successful students were able to transform a 2-D representation to a more useful representation for visualizing spatial relationships among atoms. The smallest difference was on Type IV which provided the students with concrete models for solving problems. This finding suggests that most students were beneficial from receiving 3-D models. One explanation is that it might reduce the studentsch39r cognitive load on examining the moleculars from a 2-D perspective.
    Relation Link: http://w1.dorise.info/JCSE/paper_detail.php?pid=041119930010020161
    http://www.ase.org.tw/
    URI: http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/81429
    Appears in Collections:[分子與細胞生物研究所] 期刊論文
    [生命科學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML464View/Open


    在NTHUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護,僅提供學術研究及教育使用,敬請尊重著作權人之權益。若須利用於商業或營利,請先取得著作權人授權。
    若發現本網站收錄之內容有侵害著作權人權益之情事,請權利人通知本網站管理者(smluo@lib.nthu.edu.tw),管理者將立即採取移除該內容等補救措施。

    SFX Query

    與系統管理員聯絡

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback